Re: ElGamal signature encoding

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jim Gillogly (jim@mentat.com)
Mon, 6 Apr 98 16:45:23 PDT


Hal said:
> >At the IETF meeting last week, there was a rumor going around of a
> >patent which would cover ElGamal signatures (but supposedly not DSS).
> >No details were available, however, and I haven't heard anything more
> >about it.

Ulf responded:
> It's the other way round. Schnorr claims that DSS is covered by his
> patent (on the other hand, knowledgeable sources say it covers nothing
> but the Schnorr algorithm implemented on chip cards). There is also a
> DSS patent assigned to the US government which is available
> royalty-free.

Perhaps it's both then, since Hal is right about the rumor. At the
IETF S/MIME working group meeting on 30 Mar it was announced in
suitably friend-of-a-friend third person terms that some variants of
the ANSI X9.42 Diffie-Hellman (aka ElGamal) scheme had had patents
applied for by an unnamed company or companies. The S/MIME WG was
going to draft a letter to various companies describing the proposed
use of D-H and requesting that they disclose any pending patents that
they felt were relevant. At the OpenPGP working group meeting on 1 Apr
Paul Hoffman of Internet Mail Consortium and S/MIME WG indicated that
(a) he didn't really know who the companies were, but (b) he expected
to have a definitive reading on the patent problems within a few days.

        Jim Gillogly


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:16:53 ADT