Re: publishing a paper for peer review

Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Mon, 15 Jun 1998 23:35:04 -0400

• Next message: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Previous message: Sprokkit Amhal: "Re: I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• Maybe in reply to: Bruce Schneier: "I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• Next in thread: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"

"Sprokkit Amhal" writes:
> Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
> >PDF seems to be pretty universal right now, and pretty good for most
> >purposes.
>
> Is there any advantage of PDF over HTML?

HTML is *not* a layout language. PDF is. PDF can express things like
complicated math and vector diagrams -- HTML cannot.

Perry

• Next message: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Previous message: Sprokkit Amhal: "Re: I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• Maybe in reply to: Bruce Schneier: "I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• Next in thread: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"