Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows

tony@secapl.com
Fri, 19 Jun 1998 10:01:23 -0400 (EDT)

• Next message: Sunder: "Re: $100,000 reward"
• Previous message: Trei, Peter: "RE: ASIC price/volume/performance"
• Maybe in reply to: Tim Dierks: "ASIC price/volume/performance"
• Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"
• Reply: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"

On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> This has been discussed before....
>
> GlobalLock/GlobalUnlock do not lock pages into memory. Memory that has been
> GlobalLock'd can still be paged out.

Does this hold true in systems that have virtual memory disabled? (after
putting enough physical memory in first, of course.) Does any paging
happen then? I don't see any disk activity, but have not tested for
patterns yet.

• Next message: Sunder: "Re: $100,000 reward"
• Previous message: Trei, Peter: "RE: ASIC price/volume/performance"
• Maybe in reply to: Tim Dierks: "ASIC price/volume/performance"
• Next in thread: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"
• Reply: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: Locking physical memory (RAM) under Windows"