Re: Cryptanalysis (was Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption))

Black Unicorn (unicorn@schloss.li)
Mon, 29 Jun 1998 23:10:05 -0500

• Next message: Alex Alten: "Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption)"
• Previous message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Cryptanalysis (was Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption))"
• In reply to: Paulo Barreto: "Re: Cryptanalysis (was Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption))"
• Next in thread: Bill Stewart: "Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption)"

At 09:37 PM 6/29/98 , Paulo Barreto wrote:
>Now let me quote myself (I thought I had sufficiently stressed my words,
>but it seems it was not enough):

>> >>> NOTE: I'm NOT suggesting to put unanalyzed ciphers into widespread
>use. <<<
>Both Perry and Matt speak like I were suggesting using snake oil. This is
>too much of paranoia (neophobia?).

The road to snake oil is paved with good intentions.

• Next message: Alex Alten: "Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption)"
• Previous message: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: Cryptanalysis (was Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption))"
• In reply to: Paulo Barreto: "Re: Cryptanalysis (was Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption))"
• Next in thread: Bill Stewart: "Re: TEA (was Re: filesystem encryption)"