RE: linux kernel loopback encryption

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Ian Clysdale (iancly@entrust.com)
Thu, 16 Jul 1998 20:51:03 -0400


> In some applications, there's still a big speed issue with that. I have no
> idea about CAST's speed, but, if my memory serves me right,
> Twofish-over-Blowfish would be 2-3 times faster than 3DES.
>
        As a totally unscientific answer to this question, I just threw
together a really quick program that encrypted 100 megabytes of data. Using
the CAST-128 and 3DES implementations from our beta Java toolkit here at
Entrust, it took 47 seconds to encrypt 100M using CAST-128, and 197 seconds
to do so using 3DES. (Note that Java is legendarily slow, especially for
number-crunching.) The CAST implementation isn't stunningly optimized -
speeding it up is on my to-do list before the final release.
        It's a noticeable difference.

                                                                ian


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:20:29 ADT