Re: Noise source processing

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Enzo Michelangeli (em@who.net)
Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:50:53 +0800


-----Original Message-----
From: mgraffam@mhv.net <mgraffam@mhv.net>
Date: Friday, August 07, 1998 4:14 AM

>> Interestingly, the parity of a $10 10year old Radio shack monophonic
>> FM radio, UNSHIELDED, in a digitally-noisy environment, sampled
>> at 44Khz and 16 bits, passed Diehard.
>
>Yeah, that is pretty neat .. maybe I'll tear the shielding off of my
>source and see what sort of results I get. Maybe the shielding I
>put in place is unnecessary.

Hmmm... IMHO, it just means that you can't rely on statistic tests
alone in order to measure entropy content. In fact, you can't measure it at
all: you can only set upper bounds, but, sadly, no lower bounds.
Remember: also pi's digits would pass DIEHARD, and an external attacker
could well inject such kind of EMI into an unshielded receiver.

Enzo


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:10:56