RE: What are we going to do about spam?

Mike Rosing (eresrch@msn.fullfeed.com)
Thu, 17 Sep 1998 11:05:29 -0500 (CDT)

• Next message: Nina H. Fefferman: "Coding theory, cryptography, and number theory conference at USNA"
• Previous message: Alex Alten: "Administration Updates Encryption Policy"
• Next in thread: Dave Del Torto: "RE: What are we going to do about spam?"
• Reply: Dave Del Torto: "RE: What are we going to do about spam?"
• Reply: Adam Back: "Re: What are we going to do about spam?"

On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Walter Burton wrote:

> Absolutely. I'd even support a "list members only" posting rule. I
> understand the argument against this, but until we have some legal
> recourse to redress this b.s., that's the only solution that's gonna
> have a serious impact. Filtering would be beneficial, but most of the
> ones I see in the course of a day seem pretty random.

I'd rather the law stays out of this. I would prefer the "list members
only" posting, and have several members designated to forward anonymous
posts. I'll volunteer. That will kill the spam and give the group full
access to a wide range of messages.

Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike

• Next message: Nina H. Fefferman: "Coding theory, cryptography, and number theory conference at USNA"
• Previous message: Alex Alten: "Administration Updates Encryption Policy"
• Next in thread: Dave Del Torto: "RE: What are we going to do about spam?"
• Reply: Dave Del Torto: "RE: What are we going to do about spam?"
• Reply: Adam Back: "Re: What are we going to do about spam?"