Re: Securing data in memory

Peter Gutmann (pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz)
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 08:58:23 (NZDT)

• Next message: Keith Lockstone: "Re: Avalanche Depth of hash functions"
• Previous message: Anonymous: "Re: pkzip's prng"
• Maybe in reply to: staym@accessdata.com: "pkzip's prng"
• Next in thread: Jim Adler: "Re: Securing data in memory"

>Here's the status. The Windows 95 version is about done. We had planned on
>doing some back testing to Win3.1 if there is significant interest. Is there?
 
Given the otherwise almost nonexistant security of 3.1, it'd be nice to have a
version for that as well, provided it's not too much work.
 
Peter.
 

• Next message: Keith Lockstone: "Re: Avalanche Depth of hash functions"
• Previous message: Anonymous: "Re: pkzip's prng"
• Maybe in reply to: staym@accessdata.com: "pkzip's prng"
• Next in thread: Jim Adler: "Re: Securing data in memory"