Re: spam

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Bill Frantz (frantz@netcom.com)
Thu, 19 Nov 1998 21:15:48 -0700


At 1:07 PM -0700 11/19/98, James Nerlinger, Jr. wrote:
>I realize there is a good sized desire to allow anonymous access but is
>there really so great a posting group of anon addresses? I've been on the
>list for quite a while (I tend to simply lurk and listen) and the vast
>majority of posts are not anon.

I have gotten several very interesting insights from some of the anonymous
posters. It's an issue of quality vs. quantity. Even if less than 10% of
the posts are anonymous, those ones are still a significant contribution.

>
>Additionally, if you are considering a moderated list of any kind why not
>simply have users wishing to maintain their anonymity send their mail
>through you or via a single anon account that is subbed? It would ease the
>admin load and still allow anon posts a means of gaining post on the list.

A single exit remailer as last in the chain would be acceptable.
Redundancy cries for more than one however. Going thru a person who is
responsible for scrubbing the return address exposes that person to too
much legal pressure to reveal the identity of the poster.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | Macintosh: Didn't do every-| Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | thing right, but did know | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | the century would end. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:17:18