Re: On the Construction of Pseudo-OTP

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

mgraffam@idsi.net
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 15:42:21 -0500 (EST)


On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Jim Gillogly wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm working and developing as if there won't be a
> restrictive environment by the time my stuff is ready for prime time.
> Even if I put my stuff up on a controlled site, it won't be long
> before it gets overseas, thanks to anonymous remailers.

Good show. One thing that has been getting under my skin since the
Wassenaar announcement is that a lot of us seem to be going along with
a 56-bit keylength. I sure as hell won't. I use 3DES because I am
conservative, and I trust DES. Give me a fast 256-bit cipher that I can
trust (AES winner), and I'm there. Small RSA keys? Ahem. No.

> Which reminds me, perhaps another good project would be a source code
> whitener, to sand off the characteristic coding fingerprints of known
> crypto export offenders.

Sounds like a good idea. Seems like a generic source-reformatter would
do this though. I'm thinking Emacs.

Michael J. Graffam (mgraffam@idsi.net) http://www.idsi.net/~mgraffam
"86% of conspiracy theories have some basis in truth... but, oddly enough,
it's that last 14% that usually gets you killed."
    --Talas (http://cadvantage.com/~algaeman/conspiracy/public.htm)


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:02