Re: On the Construction of Pseudo-OTP

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

David R. Conrad (drc@adni.net)
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:57:07 -0500 (EST)


On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:

> Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > I agree with Jim. You are, at the very least, making yourself look foolish.
>
> I expect from a scientific discussion something more than such
> categorical statements without supporting arguments.
>
> M. K. Shen

They've already told you why they feel that way. The term "Pseudo-OTP" is
confusing, misleading, inextricably tied to snake oil, and is a neologism
where a perfectly acceptable term, Stream Cipher, already exists.

Maybe you don't agree with that. But they have certainly made their case
clear. And, for whatever it's worth, I agree with them. If I was to
start designing stream ciphers, which is something I'm not qualified to
do, I would call them stream ciphers.

David R. Conrad <drc@adni.net>
This is why I love America -- that any kid can dream "I'm going to get
naked with the President" ... and that dream can actually come true.
What a great country! -- Michael Moore


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:02