the spooks have guns, dumbass; was Furriners

Anonymous (nobody@replay.com)
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 06:18:05 +0100

• Next message: bram: "Re: Anonymous on RNG's"
• Previous message: Daniel J. Frasnelli: "Re: "Damn Furriners" :-)"
• Next in thread: Robert Hettinga: "Re: the spooks have guns, dumbass; was Furriners"
• Reply: Robert Hettinga: "Re: the spooks have guns, dumbass; was Furriners"

At 08:09 PM 1/24/99 -0800, bram wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>
>> So, again, what I'm really interested in finding out is, if you had a group
>> of American cryptographic engineers in the same room, is there anything you
>> could do in that room that you couldn't do if there were any foriegn
>> nationals present?
>
>Not if you didn't go around talking about it.
>
>-Bram

<expletive deleted> You have to assume someone in the room is a spook.

There is a diode between you and Boris.

The men in suits have guns. And will use them if you don't play
by their linguistics.

---"Is"

• Next message: bram: "Re: Anonymous on RNG's"
• Previous message: Daniel J. Frasnelli: "Re: "Damn Furriners" :-)"
• Next in thread: Robert Hettinga: "Re: the spooks have guns, dumbass; was Furriners"
• Reply: Robert Hettinga: "Re: the spooks have guns, dumbass; was Furriners"