Re: A Method of Session Key Generation

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Jim Gillogly (jim@acm.org)
Mon, 01 Feb 1999 00:04:38 -0800


M-K Shen wrote:
> Brad Kemp wrote:
>>
>> If there is any data loss (i.e. lost packet or corrupted disk) the
>> rest of the plaintext is lost.
>
> I have addressed this point in a response to Jim Gillogly. If
> communication line is functioning, their protocol should take care
> of lost packets and retrasnsmission. Certainly my scheme does not
> address hardware problems on the side of communication partners. But
> that is also not addressed by other schemes, if I don't err.

Taking these in reverse order: You do. It is. True enough. Not
relevant to your session key scheme. Not adequately.

'Nuff said... on this end, anyway.

-- 
	Jim Gillogly
	Highday, 11 Solmath S.R. 1999, 08:00
	12.19.5.16.6, 13 Cimi 19 Muan, Second Lord of Night


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:25