[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv(very boring)

From: stefan <stefan lkcc org>
To: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777 yahoo com>
Cc: dia-list gnome org, gimpwin-dev yahoogroups com,MinGW-users lists sourceforge net
Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv(very boring)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 03:22:46 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, James Michael DuPont wrote:

> Dear fellow hackers,

Hello!

> I am working on  putting my packages on sourceforge right now,
> https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=19878
> I still have not converted all of my packages to the high standards
> that I preach, this of course makes me a hypocrite in one aspect.

The 'libiconv' library "port" for MinGW32 has always been maintained at
the 'mingwrep' project on sourceforge.

<http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=7382>

Too bad we are doing duplicate work...

Cheers,
	stefan@lkcc.org

Follow-Ups:
- Will the real libiconv please stand up! Was : Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)
  - From: James Michael DuPont

References:
- baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)
  - From: James Michael DuPont

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] Mail converted by Mofo Magic and the Flying D