Re: Visible UML Comments

[<mattam netcourrier com>]

On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:01:37AM -0500, Lars Clausen wrote: 
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, mattam@netcourrier.com wrote:
> > 
> > Well, the menu code was much of an experiment and I didn't finish it :)
> > I'm gonna fix this right now, thanks for the pointer.
> > I'll add switches for attributes and operations visibility as well.
> > Any other switch someone think of ?
> 
> Abstract class, template class, maybe Suppress Attributes/Operations (I
> never liked that visible+suppressed thing, is that a normal UML thing?
> 

	I attached a patch for the class object menu with switches for visible
comments, attributes or operations, and abstract and template class toggles. 
It uses a workaround to have the menu labels dynamically change (show/hide). 

	I'm not sure Template class switch is useful, since you need to
type formal parameters, but why	not?

	I do not understand what suppress attributes/operations do, as
they have the same behavior as show attributes/operations. Am I wrong?
Anyway I don't think they have anything to do with UML, so we can get
rid of it if nobody sees it as a must. 


> -Lars
> 
> -- 
> Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
> "I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
> will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
>     --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?
> _______________________________________________
> Dia-list mailing list
> Dia-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
> 
> 

-- 
"Not only is there no God, but try finding a plumber on Sunday. "
 - Woody Allen

MaT|TaM (http://mattam.ath.cx)

classmenu.diff.gz