Re: Visible UML Comments

[Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Alan Horkan wrote:
> 
>> > And since you're doing object menus anyway, could you add the other
>> > boolean attributes as well?
>> >
>>
>> Well, the menu code was much of an experiment and I didn't finish it :)
>> I'm gonna fix this right now, thanks for the pointer.
>> I'll add switches for attributes and operations visibility as well.
>> Any other switch someone think of ?
> 
> aspectratio  fixed | free  ?
> 
> Although it would make my square and cirle shapes fairly redundant i
> would really like to have it.  (have not followed the thread hope im
> ontopic, sorry if i am not)

We were talking about the UML objects, but if we extend the object menu
mechanism anyway, it could apply to shapes, too.  Though better would
probably be to have a generic way to keep aspectratio (Shift-drag,
perhaps).

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?