[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Will the real libiconv please stand up! Was : Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)

From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd yahoo com>
To: Bruno Haible <bruno clisp org>
Cc: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777 yahoo com>,stefan <stefan lkcc org>, gnuwin32-users lists sourceforge net,koron users sourceforge net, dia-list gnome org,gimpwin-dev yahoogroups com, MinGW-users lists sourceforge net
Subject: Re: Will the real libiconv please stand up! Was : Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 15:10:45 -0400

Bruno Haible wrote:

> Strange. With the mingw-2.1 (which I got from
> http://www.cygwin.com/mirrors.html,
> *not* from http://www.mingw.org/)
> libiconv builds out of the box.
>

Same package loaded by the same maintainer to two different distribution
site.  The difference, and this in itself should cause no difference, I
choose to build the Cygwin release with Cygwin's gcc and the MinGW release
with the MinGW gcc.

Earnie.

References:
- Re: Will the real libiconv please stand up! Was : Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)
  - From: Bruno Haible
- Re: Will the real libiconv please stand up! Was : Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)
  - From: James Michael DuPont
- Re: Will the real libiconv please stand up! Was : Re: [Mingw-users] baby steps, an half-finshed packaging of libiconv (very boring)
  - From: Bruno Haible

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] Mail converted by Mofo Magic and the Flying D