Re: tweaking UML diagrams

[Robert Staudinger <robsta stereolyzer net>]

Thanks, changing the #define works!
I noticed that all types of UML objects have their own hardcoded
line-width (usually 0.1). Would it be worth defining it centrally so all
UML objects (including aggregation arrows, etc.) would share one value?

-Rob

Am Die, den 27.07.2004 schrieb Lars Clausen um 22:21:
> On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 22:05, Robert Staudinger wrote:
> > Hello, 
> > 
> > i've been doing a few class diagrams in dia, which i then exported to
> > eps in order to include them in a latex document.
> > It would be really cool if there would be a possibility to reduce the
> > class-boxes', arrows' etc. border width because the diagram looks very
> > "bold" after latex pdf generation.
> > I've been looking into the saved .dia file, but line-width doesn't seem
> > to be an explicit property of the uml shapes.
> > Any possibility to get "finer" lines would really help me. Maybe there's
> > even a possibility to hack (postprocess :) the eps file? 
> 
> The UML class source file defines 
> 
> #define UMLCLASS_BORDER 0.1
> 
> While it can be changed to be settable in the properties, the UML class
> code is really fugly and I cannot advice anyone who values his or her
> sanity to try to add stuff to it.
> 
> Still haven't heard back about the PROP_LIST update that would allow us
> to finally get all UML objects into stdprop format (basically, it has to
> provide the list-with-properties-per-item like UML Class operations and
> attributes).
> 
> -Lars
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dia-list mailing list
> Dia-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
> FAQ at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/faq.html
> Main page at http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia
>