Re: publishing a paper for peer review

Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:55:34 -0400

• Next message: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Previous message: Michael C. Richardson: "looking for a MAC with keys that follow"
• Next in thread: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Reply: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"

Ian Goldberg writes:
> Any of Postscript, PDF, or HTML would be better than RTF. Although
> technically, RTF is an open standard(*), I don't know of any RTF viewers
> for non-Microsoft platforms.

Actually, if I recall properly, there is an X RTF viewer out there,
but I haven't seen it in many years.

PDF seems to be pretty universal right now, and pretty good for most
purposes.

Perry

• Next message: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Previous message: Michael C. Richardson: "looking for a MAC with keys that follow"
• Next in thread: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Reply: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"