Re: publishing a paper for peer review

Sprokkit Amhal (sprokkit@hotmail.com)
Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:35:36 PDT

• Next message: Sprokkit Amhal: "Re: I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• Previous message: Bruce Schneier: "Re: I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• In reply to: kopi kau: "Re: I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Reply: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Reply: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"

Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
>PDF seems to be pretty universal right now, and pretty good for most
>purposes.

   Is there any advantage of PDF over HTML? HTML is network transparent
and human readable, and that goes a long way....

    ::sprokkit::

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

• Next message: Sprokkit Amhal: "Re: I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• Previous message: Bruce Schneier: "Re: I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• In reply to: kopi kau: "Re: I have the Twofish paper in pdf; thanks"
• Next in thread: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Reply: Perry E. Metzger: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"
• Reply: mgraffam@mhv.net: "Re: publishing a paper for peer review"