Re: RC5/6 Patents - Clarifications

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Bruce Schneier (schneier@counterpane.com)
Tue, 28 Jul 1998 11:32:55 -0500


At 11:08 AM 7/28/98 -0400, KDBriggs1@aol.com wrote:
>vin@shore.net wrote:
>>>>
>Bruce Schneier summarized the situation in Applied
>Cryptography II by saying, in effect, that the DSA is still clouded by
>patent issues.
><<<
>
>But Schneier also says this on p. 498 of AC2:
>
>"All of the various discrete-logarithm-based digital signature schemes have
>been put in one coherent framework. In my opinion this finally puts to rest
>any patent dispute between Schnorr and DSA: DSA is not a derivative of
>Schnorr, nor even of ElGamal. All three are examples of this general
>construction, and this general construction is unpatented."

Yes, but I am not a patent attorney. The above is my opinion, not a legal
opinion.

Bruce
**********************************************************************
Bruce Schneier, President, Counterpane Systems Phone: 612-823-1098
101 E Minnehaha Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55419 Fax: 612-823-1590
           Free crypto newsletter. See: http://www.counterpane.com


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Fri Aug 21 1998 - 17:20:58 ADT