Re: Abstract Algorithms

mib@io.com
Tue, 28 Jul 1998 12:37:17 -0500

• Next message: Vin McLellan: "Patents & the AES Process - NIST Notes"
• Previous message: Bruce Schneier: "Re: RC5/6 Patents - Clarifications"
• In reply to: KDBriggs1@aol.com: "Re: RC5/6 Patents - Clarifications"
• Next in thread: Ben Laurie: "Re: Abstract Algorithms"

On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 11:26:00AM +0100, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> A question of which I don't yet know the exact answer is: Is it
> allowed (without restriction) according to US legislation to export
> (or publish) an abstract algorithm based on which a strong crypto
> can be implemented.

Like pseudocode, you mean?

-- 
http://www.io.com/~mib/ | "Say what you know, do what you must, come what may."
41.035437 N 73.567253 W |   3490 FE89 45E8 27B8 234A 153E 5FA5 F587 4243 FE81

• Next message: Vin McLellan: "Patents & the AES Process - NIST Notes"
• Previous message: Bruce Schneier: "Re: RC5/6 Patents - Clarifications"
• In reply to: KDBriggs1@aol.com: "Re: RC5/6 Patents - Clarifications"
• Next in thread: Ben Laurie: "Re: Abstract Algorithms"