Re: spam

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Perry E. Metzger (perry@piermont.com)
Fri, 20 Nov 1998 10:40:18 -0500


Kathleen Ellis writes:
> I'm also inclined to 'lurk and listen', but I'd state that it's a mistake
> to start asking this sort of question. Quantity of posts coming through
> remailers is irrelevant. The ability to post anonymously to this list is
> very valuable, especially if you live in a country (such as the US) where
> writing cryptographic code can be a risky political act.

Anonymous postings are accepted to my (moderated) email lists as
easily as non-anonymous postings. I don't distinguish them.

Since a human being (me) examines every post before forwarding it,
spam is stopped without preventing anonymity. There is no need for me
to know who is posting the anonymous messages at all -- only a need
for the poster to make sure they are on topic.

Perry


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:17:18