Disregard, please (was Re: ATT Research Policies)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

jim finder (jim_finder@hotmail.com)
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:16:40 CST


I wrote:
>>"Daniel J. Frasnelli" <dfrasnel@csee.wvu.edu> writes:
>> As my colleague points out, chances are that the folks at >>AT&T's
>>research lab doing crypto hold at least one form or another of DoD
>>TS/SCI
>>clearances by virtue of the average experience level there.
>
>I don't know for sure about AT&T research, but I do know that most
>crypto research labs in the USA with which I'm familiar do require a
>clearence for at least some of their people. Most, maybe all, of the
>cryptography people at my (communications mfg / government >contractor)
company have them.
>
>The 9 people I know at AT&T research in the crypto group
>all have clearences (TS or TS/SCI). I don't know if that's a
>policy to work there, if the whole facility is classified, or
>if the individuals involved happen to have them because some
>project to which they are or were assigned required them.
>
>Jim

I have been informed by my management that I am mistaken about AT&T
Research and that they don't require security clearences in the
crypto research group. There is no official connection between
AT&T Research Labs and the Department of Defense and none should
be implied or inferred from my message.

I have also been informed by my management that the subject of
security clearences at AT&T Research Labs is not appropriate
material for public discussion.

I'm sorry for any trouble this may have caused anyone. Please
consider this subject matter closed.

Jim

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

 
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.

Other Directory Sites: SeekWonder | Directory Owners Forum

The following archive was created by hippie-mail 7.98617-22 on Sat Apr 10 1999 - 01:18:05