[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: More on UML state and activity diagrams
- From: Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <asierra servidor unam mx>
- To: <dia-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: More on UML state and activity diagrams
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:47:33 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> What about rewriting new objects (two different objects), leaving the
> old code alone for the moment, and putting only the new objects on the
> sheet(s)?
I think that we could do a new object for the initial/final states. The
current state (normal/activity) would stay as it is (after my first
patch). Of course the old pixmap belongs to the new object and "state"
would have its own. So people that used the old state machine (and that
can load it) would not had any problem.
What dou you think?
--
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
asierra@servidor.unam.mx
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Mail converted by Mofo Magic and the Flying D
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of
their respective owners.
Related Sites:
eBay Registration |
Bakie Directory |
Directory Owners Forum |
eLoan |
Cash Advance |
OPEN |
OPEN |
OPEN |
FreeCreditReport.com |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.5.3,
Copyright ©2000 - 2003, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
GuideSMACK