[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: More on UML state and activity diagrams
- From: Cyrille Chepelov <cyrille chepelov org>
- To: dia-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: More on UML state and activity diagrams
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 07:20:34 +0200
Le Wed, Jul 03, 2002, à 05:47:33PM -0500, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra a écrit:
> > What about rewriting new objects (two different objects), leaving the
> > old code alone for the moment, and putting only the new objects on the
> > sheet(s)?
>
> I think that we could do a new object for the initial/final states. The
> current state (normal/activity) would stay as it is (after my first
> patch). Of course the old pixmap belongs to the new object and "state"
> would have its own. So people that used the old state machine (and that
> can load it) would not had any problem.
Sounds good!
-- Cyrille
--
Grumpf.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Mail converted by Mofo Magic and the Flying D
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of
their respective owners.
Related Sites:
eBay Registration |
Bakie Directory |
Directory Owners Forum |
eLoan |
Cash Advance |
OPEN |
OPEN |
OPEN |
FreeCreditReport.com |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.5.3,
Copyright ©2000 - 2003, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
GuideSMACK