Re: Extension of UML/UML - Class possible?

[Lars Clausen <lrclause cs uiuc edu>]

On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Erik Wasser wrote:
> 
> Is it possible to extend the "UML - Class" object of an additional field 
> for a comment? I don't know, if this is conform the UML standard, but I 
> think it would be very handy. Something like this:
> 
> +-------------------+
> | classname         |
> +-------------------+
> | Attributes        |
> +-------------------+
> | Methods           |
> +-------------------+
> | Comment           |
> +-------------------+
> 
> Is it possible?
> 
> Thx for your help & work.

It is already done!  I'm not sure if it made it into the 0.90 release, but
it's certainly there in CVS.  I don't think it's displayed in the diagram,
though, it's just stored with the UML properties.

-Lars

-- 
Lars Clausen (http://shasta.cs.uiuc.edu/~lrclause)| Hårdgrim of Numenor
"I do not agree with a word that you say, but I   |----------------------------
will defend to the death your right to say it."   | Where are we going, and
    --Evelyn Beatrice Hall paraphrasing Voltaire  | what's with the handbasket?